Notice: MediaWiki has been updated. Report any rough edges to marcan@marcan.st
Talk:Logo Proposals: Difference between revisions
JoeLackner (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
[[User:JoshB|JoshB]] 09:46, 2 December 2010 (CET) | [[User:JoshB|JoshB]] 09:46, 2 December 2010 (CET) | ||
Haha, that's quite funny to see that in use. They modified the start "o" interestingly enough. | Haha, that's quite funny to see that in use. They modified the start "o" interestingly enough. [[User:JoeLackner|JoeLackner]] 22:28, 4 December 2010 (CET) | ||
=== Danilo Di Cuia proposal #1 === | === Danilo Di Cuia proposal #1 === |
Latest revision as of 21:28, 4 December 2010
Discuss the finalist logos. Please sign your comments with four tilde like this: ~~~~
JoshB 03:12, 29 November 2010 (CET)
Finalist logo discussion and feedback
Joe Lackner's concept
I've simplified and refined the mark, started throwing in some color (staying within the purple theme that Microsoft introduced) and some icon prototypes. I'd love to hear your thoughts on these revisions for another pass...
http://celsius.ws/clients/openkinect/
I don't know if this is tacky, but have you tried giving the K bit some perspective so it goes behind the I? Something along these lines:
http://upload.pixelfaction.com/files/4cf575a0_openkinect.png
--LostInCake 23:09, 30 November 2010 (CET)
LostInCake: keep in mind that in black and white the gradients will not be there to create a perspective effect. You could need to add a white border where there is overlap to show what is over and under.
Also of note -- this Korean OpenKinect site started using one of Joe's logos: http://cafe.naver.com/openkinect JoshB 09:46, 2 December 2010 (CET)
Haha, that's quite funny to see that in use. They modified the start "o" interestingly enough. JoeLackner 22:28, 4 December 2010 (CET)
Danilo Di Cuia proposal #1
- Logo concept:
- Based on Kinect's green led and the cameras points of view.
- Logo
- Animation:
Jonathan Hall's concept
I captured these two suggestions from the mailing list discussion:
Josh Blake's modification of the no-pacmen logo:
http://i.imgur.com/pCxD2.png
Danilo's mashup of concepts:
http://i.imgur.com/ldshA.png
JoshB 03:12, 29 November 2010 (CET)
I think this logo basically just needed to be simplified at tad bit. The logo part of it is all that we really need and should be advertised as such. The text can be added in places like a website etc where the logo might need to be explained. http://clients.junketdesign.com/openkinect/logos/logo_openkinect-02.png <--- just keep the swirly logo bit. --LostInCake 06:03, 29 November 2010 (CET)